1) Potential causes and sources: Identify the potential causes and sources or groups of similar sources that will need to be controlled to achieve any watershed goals identified in the plan, as discussed immediately below. Sources that need to be controlled should be identified at the significant subcategory level with estimates of the extent to which they are present in the watershed. In the case of a protection plan these may be threats as opposed to actual sources of pollutants.
2) Load Reductions: Estimate of the loads reductions expected for the management measures described below (recognizing the natural variability and the difficulty in precisely predicting the performance of management measures over time). Estimates should be provided at the same level as in item above. This step will be difficult since there is no TMDL; however, baseline conditions need to be established.
3) Management measures: Description of the management measures that will need to be implemented to achieve the watershed goals identified in this protection plan, and an identification (using a map or description) of the critical areas in which those measures will be needed to implement this plan. Discuss how the proposed management measures, when implemented, will protect and perhaps improve water quality goals should also be included here.
4) Technical and financial assistance: Estimate of the amounts of technical and financial assistance needed; associated cost, and/or the sources and authorities that will be relied upon to implement this plan. As sources of funding, States should consider the use of their Section 319 programs, State Revolving Funds, USDA’s Environmental Quality Incentives Program and Conservation Reserve Program, and other relevant Federal, State, local and private funds that may be available to assist in implementing this plan.
5) Outreach and education: An information/education component that will be used to enhance public understanding of the project and encourage their early and continued participation in selecting, designing, and implementing the nonpoint management measures that will be implemented.
6) Schedule: A schedule for implementing the nonpoint management measures identified in this plan that is reasonably expeditious.
7) Milestones: Description of interim, measurable milestones for determining whether nonpoint management measures or other control actions are being implemented.
8) Adaptive management: Set of criteria that can be used to determine whether watershed goals are being achieved over time and substantial progress is being made towards protecting water quality standards and, if not, the criteria for determining whether this plan needs to be revised.
9) Monitoring: A monitoring plan to evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation efforts over time, measured against the criteria established above.
To learn more visit our WBP page and download the Elk Headwaters and/or Back Creek WPP. For additional information visit US EPA's Healthy Watershed Initiative website.
The Wild and Scenic River Act (Public Law 90-542; 16 USC 1271 et seq) was created by Congress in 1968 to preserve rivers with outstanding natural, cultural and recreational values in a free-flowing condition for the enjoyment of present and future generations. There is a rigerous nomination process. The National Park Service recommends developing State, Federal and local partnerships to nominate your river-candidate. In West Virginia, the Bluestone River is the only Wild and Scenic designee. CLICK-HERE to learn more